How Addiction Affects Mood and Emotional Regulation

This is written for two people. The one trying to understand why somebody they love has become unrecognisable, and the one being described, who quite often cannot account for their own behaviour either. Most pages on this topic pick a side. The reason to write it for both is that the answer is the same, and each of them tends to assume the other understands what is happening.

"He's a Different Person"

It is the sentence families use more than any other, usually with an apology attached, as though it were an exaggeration. It is not. It is close to a clinical description, and it is worth taking literally rather than treating as a figure of speech.

What it usually describes is somebody who is recognisable at some points and not at others. Reasonable in the morning. Unrecognisable by evening. Fine for a week, then not. The inconsistency is what makes it so disorienting, because a consistent change would at least be something you could adjust to. This one keeps handing back the person you know for long enough that you cannot write them off.

Here is the part that rarely gets said: the person doing it frequently does not understand it either. People describe watching themselves say something and being unable to stop it, or coming out of an argument with no clear account of how it escalated. That is not a convenient story told afterwards. It is a fairly precise description of what happens when the system that would normally catch a reaction before it lands is not working properly.

So both readers of this page are frequently asking the same question about the same person, separately, and assuming the other one has an answer.

What Substances Change

Three systems account for most of it, and none of them require any neuroscience to follow ^[1].

• The reward circuit stops responding to ordinary things. Substances overwhelm it, and with repeated exposure it adapts by becoming less sensitive. The result is not only that the drug matters more. It is that food, company, work and everything else register less, because the scale has been reset.
• The stress system becomes more reactive. A region called the extended amygdala drives feelings of anxiety, irritability and unease, and it grows more sensitive with continued use. The baseline moves. Things that would once have been mildly annoying arrive as genuinely intolerable.
• Impulse control is impaired. The prefrontal cortex is what lets anyone plan, weigh consequences and stop themselves. It is one of the areas most affected, which is why the gap between feeling something and doing something narrows so much.

Put those together and the picture is a person whose emotional reactions are stronger, whose tolerance is lower, and whose brakes are worse, all at once. That is not a character revelation. It is a description of altered physiology, and it is the single most useful thing for a family to understand.

It is also not the whole story. Physiology explains why a reaction is harder to contain. It does not decide what somebody does next, and this page comes back to that.

Irritability and the Short Fuse

After anxiety and low mood, this is what families describe most: a short fuse, disproportionate reactions, anger arriving from nowhere over something small.

The counterintuitive part is when it happens. Most people assume the worst behaviour comes while somebody is under the influence. Frequently it does not. The anxiety, irritability and unease that the stress system produces are at their strongest after the effect fades, which means the difficult hours are often the gaps rather than the use itself ^[1].

NIDA describes the endpoint of that pattern plainly: people come to use for temporary relief from the discomfort rather than to get high ^[1]. The substance has stopped being the thing that produces a good feeling and become the thing that briefly stops a bad one.

This matters because of the conclusion families draw when they get the timing backwards. If the calm periods look like the drug and the anger looks like the gaps, it is very easy to decide that the anger is the real person and the calm was the performance. The sequence is usually the other way round.

Feeling Nothing at All

Volatility gets all the attention. The opposite is at least as common and almost nobody writes about it.

When the reward circuit has adapted, the effect is not only that ordinary pleasures are less enjoyable. It is that emotional range narrows in general. NIDA's own description of it is that a person eventually feels flat, without motivation, lifeless, and unable to enjoy things that used to matter to them ^[1].

People describe this as the most frightening part, more than the anger. Being unable to feel much about your own children, or about news that should have landed hard, is a specific and lonely kind of alarm, and it tends to get read as evidence of being a bad person rather than as a symptom.

For families it is easily mistaken for indifference. Someone who seems unmoved by the damage being done can look like someone who does not care. Blunted emotional response and an absence of caring look identical from outside and are not the same thing.

Which Came First?

Almost everyone reaches this question eventually. Was there always depression or anxiety underneath, and the substance use followed, or has the substance use produced all of it? People arrive at it about themselves and about somebody else, and it is usually asked as though there were a way to settle it.

The honest answer is that it is genuinely difficult, and frequently cannot be determined while someone is still using. NIDA sets out three explanations that all have evidence behind them: shared genetic vulnerability, common environmental factors such as stress and trauma, and substance use itself altering the brain in ways that trigger or worsen mental illness. Any combination may be operating in one person ^[2].

It is harder still because substance use can produce symptoms that closely resemble a mood disorder. That is precisely why a period without substances is usually needed before the picture clarifies, and why an assessment worth trusting happens during treatment rather than in advance of it ^[2][3].

Nothing on this page can tell you whether you have bipolar disorder, depression or an anxiety disorder, and neither can anybody in a first phone call. What is known is that treating one side and ignoring the other tends not to hold, which is the entire argument for dual diagnosis treatment rather than treating the substance use and hoping the rest follows.

If you are having thoughts of harming yourself, that is worth acting on now rather than waiting for anything else to be sorted out. Call or text 988, the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline, at any hour. It is free and confidential, and you do not have to be in immediate danger to use it.

Mood in Early Recovery

This section exists because the expectation people carry into treatment is usually wrong, and being wrong about it costs some of them the attempt.

The expectation is that stopping fixes the mood. What tends to happen is that mood stays difficult for a while and can get worse before it gets better. The reward circuit does not reset the moment the substance stops, so the flatness can outlast the drug by a considerable margin, and irritability and anxiety often continue while the stress system settles ^[1][4].

Someone three weeks in who feels worse than they did while using has not failed and is not proof that treatment does not work. That is the most common misreading there is, and it is a frequent reason people leave early, right at the point where continuing is what the improvement depends on.

We are deliberately not putting a number on how long. It varies enormously with the substance, the duration, the person and whether there is a mental health condition underneath, and a specific figure that turns out to be wrong costs somebody their confidence in treatment at the worst possible moment. What can be said is that the direction is generally upward, that it is uneven, and that clinicians expect this rather than being surprised by it.

Understanding Is Not Accepting

Everything above explains why behaviour happens. None of it makes any of that behaviour acceptable, and it should not be read as a reason to absorb more of it.

The two ideas sit together without much difficulty in practice. Someone can be genuinely unable to regulate their reactions in the way they normally would, and it can still be true that you should not be shouted at, frightened, or made responsible for managing somebody else's temper. Explaining a mechanism is not issuing a permission.

If there is aggression, or you are frightened, that comes first and nothing on this page competes with it. Get yourself and anyone else in the house somewhere safe. A domestic violence advocate is better placed to help with that than we are, and doing it does not mean giving up on the person.

Beyond that, support for families covers the part nobody prepares you for: what to do with your own anger, how to stop organising your life around somebody else's mood, and how to stay in contact with a person without accepting everything that comes with them.

When Mood Needs Treating Too

Some of what this page describes settles on its own once substances are out of the picture and the brain has had time. Some of it does not, because there was a mood or anxiety disorder there independently, and that part needs treating in its own right.

Distinguishing the two is a clinical job rather than a self-assessment, and it usually starts with medically supervised detox, both because withdrawal from some substances is medically risky and because very little can be assessed accurately in the middle of it. What follows is where the real work sits, and where a proper psychiatric assessment becomes possible.

Where both are present, they are treated in the same plan by the same team rather than one being referred elsewhere. That is what dual diagnosis care means, and it exists because the alternative has a poor track record.

FAQs

Why does my husband seem like a different person?

Substances change the brain systems that regulate mood, reward and impulse control. Someone who is measured when sober and volatile when using is not showing you a hidden personality. They are showing you the effect of a substance on the systems that normally keep emotion in check.

Is the anger part of the addiction or is it who they are?

Usually it tracks the substance use, which is why families so often describe someone becoming recognisable again when it stops. That does not make the behaviour acceptable or your safety negotiable. If you feel unsafe, act on that first and work out the rest afterwards.

Does mood get better when someone stops using?

Generally yes, but not immediately and often not smoothly. Emotional volatility can continue after use stops and sometimes intensifies before it settles. That is expected rather than a sign that treatment is failing, and it is one of the most common reasons people abandon it early.

Do I have bipolar disorder or is it the drugs?

That is genuinely hard to answer while someone is using, because substance use can produce symptoms that closely resemble a mood disorder. It usually becomes clearer after a period without substances, which is one reason a proper assessment happens during treatment rather than before it.

Why do I feel nothing at all?

Emotional numbness is as common as volatility and much less talked about. Substances can flatten emotional range as well as amplify it, and that flatness tends to lift gradually rather than all at once.

Can you treat the mood problems and the substance use together?

Yes, and together is the point. Addressing one and not the other tends not to hold, which is why mental health care sits inside the same treatment plan rather than being referred out to somewhere else.

Sources

1. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Drugs and the Brain: Drugs, Brains, and Behavior.
2. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Common Comorbidities with Substance Use Disorders.
3. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Substance Use and Co-Occurring Mental Disorders.
4. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Treatment and Recovery: Drugs, Brains, and Behavior.

Read Next

• Brain damage from drugs and alcohol, and what recovers
• Depersonalisation and alcohol

Written by

Dr. Keith Garcia, MD, PhD

Medical Director

Dr. Keith Garcia is the Medical Director at Virtue Recovery Center Killeen, a psychiatrist with a distinguished background in medicine, neuroscience, and psychiatric research. He earned his Bachelor of Arts in biology and biochemistry from Rice University, his M.D. from the University of Texas Medical School in Houston, and his Ph.D. from the University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Science. He completed his psychiatry residency at Washington University in St. Louis, where he served as chief resident and later directed the resident psychiatry clinic and outpatient psychiatric day hospital at Barnes-Jewish Hospital. His research focused on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a treatment for depression.

Read Full Bio →

Medically reviewed by Dr. Keith Garcia, MD, PhD, Medical Director